© 2026 Rooming House Finance. All rights reserved.
28 August 2026
Why Two Residential Properties Can Be Viewed Very Differently By Lenders
One of the comments I hear most often from investors entering the rooming house space is:
"But it's still a residential property..."
They're absolutely right.
From a planning perspective, a Class 1B rooming house is generally located within residential areas and forms part of Australia's residential housing supply.
So it's understandable why many investors assume the finance process will be much the same as purchasing or constructing a traditional residential investment property.
Unfortunately, this is often where many investors are caught by surprise.
One of the biggest misconceptions surrounding Class 1B rooming houses is that because the property is residential, lenders will assess it using the same lending policies as a standard investment property.
In reality, many lenders recognise that a Class 1B rooming house represents a specialised asset class.
That distinction changes everything.
Not every lender is comfortable financing this type of security.
Those that do often have dedicated lending policies specifically for rooming houses.
As a result, investors are typically working with a much smaller pool of lenders than they would for a standard residential investment property.
This doesn't mean the project can't be financed.
It simply means the funding strategy often requires a different approach.
One of the reasons Class 1B rooming houses have attracted so much attention in recent years is their income potential.
Compared with a traditional residential investment property, the projected rental income can be significantly higher.
It's easy to understand why investors become excited.
After all, the numbers can look incredibly attractive.
However, one of the biggest mistakes I see is focusing solely on the rental income without fully understanding the funding landscape that comes with it.
Higher returns rarely come without greater complexity.
If rooming houses attracted the same rental income and lenders offered the same interest rates, the same fees, the same Loan to Value Ratios and the same lending policies as a standard residential investment property, then every investor would be building them.
The reality is that specialised assets are assessed differently because they present a different lending proposition.
That often means investors should expect:
None of these factors are necessarily negative.
They're simply part of financing a specialised asset class.
The higher rental income can absolutely make these developments attractive.
But understanding the funding landscape is just as important as understanding the projected income.
The most successful investors don't simply chase higher returns.
They understand the trade-offs required to achieve them.
Another significant difference investors often encounter is the valuation process.
A traditional residential investment property is generally assessed using comparable residential sales.
A completed Class 1B rooming house may instead be assessed using commercial valuation principles, where the income-producing capacity of the asset becomes a much more significant factor in determining value.
This isn't better or worse.
It's simply different.
Understanding that distinction early helps investors appreciate why these projects often require additional planning and why funding discussions should begin well before construction.
Financing the construction of a standard residential investment property is generally considered lower risk by lenders than financing the construction of a specialised asset.
With a Class 1B rooming house, lenders are funding a purpose-built income-producing development.
That additional complexity may result in:
Again, these aren't barriers.
They're simply characteristics of financing a specialised development.
One of the reasons I enjoy working in this space is because expectations become much easier to manage once investors understand how lenders assess these projects.
The higher rental income often attracts people to rooming houses.
Understanding the funding landscape is what helps those projects become reality.
One without the other can quickly lead to disappointment.
I've always believed that good finance advice isn't simply about obtaining loan approval.
It's about helping clients understand the bigger picture before they commit.
Every development involves a series of decisions.
The earlier those decisions are made with the funding strategy in mind, the more options investors typically have available to them.
That's why I encourage clients to seek finance advice before they purchase a development site, not after.
Because specialist lending isn't just about finding a lender willing to approve the loan.
It's about understanding how the asset is likely to be viewed from the very beginning.
At Evermore Finance Group, one principle underpins every recommendation we make.
Finance First. Property Second.
Because successful rooming house developments begin with strategy, not just a site.
This article provides general information only and should not be relied upon as personal financial or credit advice. Lending policies, valuation methodologies and eligibility requirements vary between lenders and individual circumstances. Professional advice should always be obtained before making financial or property decisions.
Alicja Banfield is the Founder and Managing Director of Evermore Finance Group and specialises in complex lending scenarios, including Class 1B rooming house finance, commercial lending and strategic lending solutions.
Through The Rooming House Journal, Alicja shares practical insights gained from financing specialised developments and helping investors navigate the complexities of this unique asset class.
Finance First. Property Second.
The right lending structure now could mean hundreds of thousands in additional returns over the life of your investment.